U.S. copyright=copyrite

 I am not a noted lawyer or published privacy authority and will never seek a degree or profess an education because I desire for no school to have to claim influencing my mind or coloring my principles. I have no desire to be the top 500 or top 5000 of anything or be on any list to compare my mind to another human. I choose to remain an unknown.

 

After reading one privacy article "online", I deemed the unknown public should use this short lesson. This lesson on lexicography with supporting etymology clearly explains both the EU/US privacy and copyright/[rite] regime differences and leaves absolutely no room for doubt or further debate. Following the pathway illustrated herein, the public may OWN this discovery. It is not published or talked about because it would embarrass the entire United States.

 

I am a severely brain injured polymath with no continuous memory pre-2007 and a severely limited ability to remember day-to-day. I use TBI coping techniques to address this and will send this email over and over till a professional replies or asks me to stop. Yes; I realize using polymath is a very arrogant term to use for myself. This is how I would honestly be described already in historical descriptions, if there were ever to be historical descriptions of all I will or have done. I honestly do not understand why or how I know all the "useless trivia" left in my mind from my prior addiction to learning all humanities known scientific facts. I obviously failed to do this but have learned the majority of the basics.

 

The "small" cultural difference between the EU and the US is founded in the same lexicographical error supported by unconsidered or ignored facts included herein with very exacting etymology.

 

I touch on this and other advanced science ignored in other ignored legal briefs and an online comment repeated below. This is original research to verify as a comment spawned by an "online" article. Please do not use my name. The public can and will seek to know more about me after Edwards v Beck replaces Roe v Wade for all time in a few weeks to months almost exactly as my amicus curiae and amicus replyencouraged the Eighth Circuit. If this does not happen in less than three months then this will eventually be how abortion stops funding politics and how the abortions called blessed in some future time by Jesus Christ as He approached Calvary becomes an inalienable human right.

 

----------------comment-------------------------------------------

I did not understand this cartoon but am not the sharpest crayon in the pack. I bet it has something to do with taxes and possibly being late? Editorial or political cartoons have been around since roughly the 1730's and were begun by William Hogarth doing engravings that were then printed. This artists' work or "vision" could be reproduced in early printing presses by a publisher with no artistic skills. This is why, in Hogarth's native England, the human right to control original visual creations was protected with the Engravers Act of 1734. The engraver made a personal statement or personal speech with visual art but this visual art could then be manipulated by another over two centuries before Photoshop. compare Hogarth's political cartoon wth a more vulgar modfication of this engraving like spurred the Engraver's Act of 1734.
http://theendofpornbywire.org/Why-the-1734-engravers-act/

 

The cartoon could then be used in another political publication and be caused to appear indecent or support a political statement William Hogarth would never support. The Engravers Act of 1734 protected William Hogarth's ability to protect against undesired usage of original cartoon engravings for a renewable period of about 14 years. The right to control against unauthorized usage of these first cartoons was then passed to the surviving spouse for life by the 1766 Hogarth's Act passed two years after the first political cartoonist died.

The following continued spelling error is why the human right to control original speech was never protected in the United States when "America" copied the "1710 Statute of Anne" from England almost verbatim and called this copy of an eighty year old legal rite "America's" Copy[rite] Act of 1790. The Supreme Court called this an artwork monopolization regime unworthy of being called law in Golan v Holder (10-545) in 2012.

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

In an England Noah Webster never lived in, the term colour had frustrated many children along with Noah Webster who felt it should be spelled more like it sounded in common speech. Rather than colour, Mr. Webster felt the word should be spelled color for the <Coil - or> sound or <Cull - or> verses the tortured <cull - oir> or <coil - oir>. Mr Webster asserted there had been an etymological error and revised colour to the Americanization "color" in his first American English Dictionary test-run in 1806. While revising American English in monopolized elementary school textbooks, Noah Webster did not adopt his own new alphabet or the new alphabet of Benjamin Franklin but created many Americanisms by fiat in 1827. Mr. Webster and Mr Franklin agreed on many aspects of America's opportunity to establish a newer and simpler language from the English used in England but did not stop using the letter "K" although both agreed this should be done.

 

Benjamin Franklin was a noted polymath and published author and scientist who made sure the 1787 Constitution did not use words not included in Samuel Johnston's 1755 "c-Dictionary of the English Language-c" and stated this was because the Constitution was such an impacting document with an international audience of English speakers. Benjamin Franklin required the Constitution include no newly coined terms to avoid potential misinterpretations of the actual meaning intended.

 

Too ill in 1787 to give his own speech encouraging unanimous adoption of the Constitution, Benjamin Franklin's speech was given by proxy. Mr Franklin had ensured the "progress clause" or Article I, Section 8, Clause 8 of the Constitution described the Congressional authorization needed to protect the fundamental human right to control original inventions, discoveries, or speech. Despite this honorable tenor; The United States' greatest scientist, author, and inventor refused a patent on the "Franklin Stove" invention from 1742 though offered by the governor of Pennsylvania.

 

Benjamin Franklin stated, "as we enjoy great advantages from the inventions of others, we should be glad of an opportunity to serve others by any invention of ours; and this we should do freely and generously", in his autobiography crediting "God" with any invention gifted to humanity via an inventor like himself.  This is why in America's copy[rite], newly discovered or realized facts, facts like herein are not eligible to be monopolized.

 

There was one particularly noteworthy new word "coined" by Sir William Blackstone in England in chapter 26, on p406 of Volume II, "Rights of Things" in the "Commentaries on the Laws of England"book series describing exclusive control of original intellectual property or statements perhaps later retracted in 1766. This was one decade and one year after the 1755 "c-Dictionary of the English Language-c". This authoritative series of law books is taught in ALL American laws schools today though this obvious fact has been ignored as could only be intentional.

 

Clearly Noah Webster and Benjamin Huntington used the early American hunger to secure individual human rights from Kings when the "Bill of Rights" was being considered to monopolize elementary school texts and prohibit reprinting of books imported by wealthy colonists since printing presses were now less expensive. Noah Webster did this to help ensure colour, honour, labour, and such would become color, honor, and labor. Noah Webster copied the "1710 Statute of Anne" rite for authorizing monopolizing book printing almost verbatim ignoring the subsequent "1734 Engraver's Act" and the 1766 "Hogarth's Act". Benjamin Huntington was a career lawyer and conscientious objector to the Revolutionary War. Benjamin Huntington signed the Declaration of Independence but felt armed conflict was initially a dishonorable refusal to settle the dispute legally.

 

Early in America, the "pistol duels" and "sword duels" used to protect honor in England were considered assault. Fighting to protect honor or reputation was considered absurd or a matter for attorneys to address in court. Benjamin Huntington felt there were adequate legal rituals outside the 1790 Copy[rite] regime to vicariously protect the effect original creations had on honor with the slander, defamation, and liable torts. None of these were included in the copy[rite] regime but NONE of America's attorneys or judges have ever addressed the fundamental human right never protected in America but authorized for protection in the United States like established in 1787.  The United States quickly began to be overthrown by a wealthy corporate oligarchy that now clearly controls America and is now probably irreversible.

 

The right to control personal speech online should be protected by 18 U.S.C. 2511 today if applied EXACTLY as written according to Honorable Antonin Scalia. This law was judicially voided by accident because of improper tenor.  This injustice will always be dishonorable for Jimm Larry Hendren, Erin L. Setser, and Timothy L. Brooks. 

This same law could rescue the Garcia v Google from needing to overrule the 1834 Wheaton ruling rejecting the fundamental human right to control speech after fixed (printed or engraved) that had already been protected in England for 100 years when the first SCOTUS consideration was done in America in 1834. This law, 18 U.S.C. 2511, would allow authorization of the YouTube injunction permanently as allowed by section 230 if it had been plead instead of copy[rite] violations only. It is NOT the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals duty to litigate for either party. The only honorable result today for the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals sitting en banc is to rule the common law fundamental human right to control original speech after fixed should always have been protected as the progress clause authorized in 1787 but was never done

 

I am interested in seeking only amici or co-counsel for my case before SCOTUS. The only path to fixing online might not include United States Courts due to making anonymous access to pornography a new American civil right created in 1997 by Reno v ACLU because of the centuries of impact of an over two hundred year old spelling error leading to re-establishing the indulgences one disputed by Rev Martin Luther on Oct 31, 1517.  The egregious Reno v ACLU  mistake allowed and still allows illegal "obscene, indecent, and profane" communications to be broadcast by radio and by wire begun in 1997 when there were only around 55 million subscribers to wire communications terminated on one end by radio three years before Wi-Fi was trademarked.

 

You may view this disclosure online HERE. No name is included and no link to ANY particular US v UK privacy regime article is included. It is your decision alone to encourage the continuing of a complete moral failure in America or help educate America's Courts. Do you wish to raise your children with porn by wire still around wherever children carry their phones after digital radio makes everywhere "online"? Logging-in in a authenticated way would keep the porn everywhere but allow parents to supervise their children's communications and prevent consumption of America's free pornography source better known as "online" or "nternet" though starting with a capital "I". I will never bless this undefinable slang term with usage.
You may view this disclosure online.

https://theendofpornbywire.org/copy%5Brite%5D.html

Countersuit of NetChoice

 . . . . It is much more important to litigate and force the 47 USC 153 (59) wire communications be regulated by the FCC per 47 USC Title II and seek ruinous or token RICO authorized damages against the organized criminal conspirators abusing Title II of 47 USC. 

. . . .GOOG, MSFT, and NetChoice along with hundreds of other parties and the U.S. FCC warrant making NetChoice v Fitch a class action so all coconspirators can be added as a class of counter defendants to now end more  than twenty eight years of criminal profits due to the shared criminal abuse of 47 USC 153 (59) wire communications. 

. . . . Some in the class knew or should have known it was wrong to take advantage of a clearly VOID Supreme Court mistake and should be ruined because this abuse nearly destroying hundreds of thousands of lives and creating almost universal addiction to “indulgences”. All these improper mistakes or sins done under color of law by most of humanity.  

. . . .A humanity addicted to sinful behavior allowed under the color of law and disguised as an improperly created new human right to make or consume free wire pornography secretly like was disputed first by Martin Luther in the early 16th century with his 95 Thesis. 

. . . .This free permission to make or consume free broadcasts of indecent and even obscene material has been the most damaging mistake at law ever made besides the still misunderstood but originally  honorable Roe v Wade ruling.  Roe was not a mistake until misused by the demon RBG and her cohorts.

. . . . Rather than ask SCOTUS to act and try to correct the 28 year old SCOTUS mistake at law making scores of rulings in its progeny VOID fiats, the lead Plaintiff in the countersuit, AG Lynn Fitch, seeks injunctive relief from the FCC as well as a token of damages based on a jury estimated amount of improper gains against the class of criminal conspirators  who were confused or were malicious and abused legal mistake(s) like since 1997 in Reno v ACLU and the scores of mistakes made in it’s progeny, which are now also obviously VOID.

Letter to Lara Logan

 To the staff monitoring the nets for Lara Logan,

. . . . . I just listened to a monologue on Rumble where Lara interviewed Michael Flynn in Accountability Episode 32.  To say I am impressed with Lara’s call to cowards would be wholly inadequate. If you don’t have ten minutes to listen to a whistleblowers story about taking accountability , please delete this. 

. . . . .Please think of me as a type of whistleblower with embarrassing inside information but now wishing to alert America of several FIATS that ruined honorable human culture and causing this nation to become the New Babylon of Revelations 18.  I have had a website since before GOOG existed. 

. . . .I am, or was, a well known photographer of the human figure. My photographs remain among the most noteworthy ever.  This fact is not relevant.

. . . . .I carefully photographed naked humans and strove to wholly separate these naked figures from pornography for thirty years. 

. . . .I “coined” the neologism figurenude to utterly separate these from common nude images used for titillation. My figurenudes were published on various art websites and on mine requiring authentication. My figurenudes were and still are  in books and magazines and are described as world-class figure art by many.

. . .  .Still, I was always a devout Christian and still feel even today that if God had wanted the naked human figure to be presented as purely an art object, He would have done it Himself.  The Bible reveals, as Lara knows, God did exactly this.

. . . . On Sept. 3, 2002 I became a severely brain injured incompetent and was paralyzed mid back. I retained much of my empirical knowledge but can’t remember my prior life correctly or understand why I knew so much technical information.  I know how in 1990 the USMC had directional multi line WiFi though civilians patented this nine years later.

. . . . I could not remember why I knew microwave communications using time displaced modulation could be used to transmit multiple distinct phone wire signals on one frequency. I am not sure why this Top Secret military fact was in my mind.

 . . . .   I can describe how to use analog electronics like transistors, resisters, and diodes to convert analog phone signals into time displaced digital microwave signals using analog electronics. This is understood by less than 300 people on earth, but is irrelevant.

. . . . .i encountered the internet again freshly as an incompetent and saw a website built by me before my injury.  I could not understand how broadcast wire and microwave communications, like I knew existed, could include numerous different communications wires and be broadcast to the unknown and not be regulated like the 47 USC 153 (59) common carriers these ARE.

 . . . . I could not understand why anyone could search for nudes and even raw pornography from ANYWHERE and see images like Janet Jackson’s nipple jewelry display at Google or Bing.

. . . .  This cute black titty and nipple remain the most commonly seen tit in history and display of this black tit changed the way broadcast decency was regulated or became unregulated for a bared black human titty. Black tittys now freely intrude pervasively on public wire mediums. 

. . . . .Wire and radio mediums, once regulated per the Communications Act of 1934 by the FCC, had somehow become a hazardous nuisance or lure of free anonymous access to pornography exactly like the permission to sin once sold by the church and called indulgences.

. . . . Search here for Zulu and see scores of black tits hanging out proudly though bared and asserting this as culturally acceptable in public by Zulus. I apologize if the tit colloquial for teat offends.

. . . . Around this time my daughter searched for her father’s name, Curtis J Neeley Jr, online while in school, and saw pages and pages of figurenude images. Besides Google bypassing adult  authentications and showed naked images from various websites and books and magazines in searches; Google went to a NY library and scanned all the books and republished them online and included naked art once done by me. 

. . . . “Honorable” Denny Chin in SDNY ruled these violations of the fundamental human right to exclusively control original creations of bare tits did not exist in the U.S. despite being authorized in the Creators Clause of the Constitution. 

Was wholly destroyed by Noah Webster’s 1790 Americanization of Sir William Blackstone’s 1766 “copyright” by misspelling this copying of the Censorship ritual or RITE copied almost verbatim in 1789 from the 1734 Statute of Anne. 

. . . .1789 was the year the topless model for William Hogarth died as the first person on Earth to inherit the fundamental human right to control presentation of bare tits in 1766 after a case Benjamin Franklin and Sir William Blackstone were aware of due to their familiarity with Jane Hogarth’s bare tits.  These men were familiar with a younger Jane Hogarth’s bared tits. Jane asserted the fundamental right to control printing of her tits first in 1766 as a 66 year old woman with tits clearly showing the effects of time and desiring control of reprinting of her younger tits being bared.

. . . . I asked Google to stop showing figurenudes by me to the unauthenticated and Google refused and even mocked me for daring to ask. It then took over six years and several million dollars of legal pursuit to make searching for my name mostly safe in schools and elsewhere. Go look and see.

. . . . The book preview Google scanned from a NYC library was deleted by Google as demanded despite Denny Chin in SDNY not recognizing the fundamental human right to exclusively control original images of bared tits for a time in the Authors Guild v Google Inc case and saying pdf previews of books found in libraries were an allowed “fair use” because of over a century of Americanization of the book printing rite imported and misspelled in Noah Webster’s 1790 etymology trick called the Copyright Act.

. . .  . Misspelled by FIAT despite only establishing an American print censoring regiment to make Webster’s dictionaries a monopoly in U.S. schools. This mistake also changed American English to look and sound a bit different from the English spoken in England. It did not, however, change English tongue into American tung despite the wishes of Webster, who changed honour, flavour, humour, etc to honor, flavor, honor, etc.by FIAT.

. . . . It is hard to imagine the utter destruction of common human decency developed over several thousand years was founded on two legal mistakes. 

Mistake #1 1790

Copy[RITE] called CopyRIGHT

. . . . Noah Webster colluded with Benjamin Huntington and spelled the copy ritual or copy rite of America as copyright though ignoring the human right already protected in England. Sir William Blackstone’s 1766 copyRIGHT protected the fundamental human right to control republication of art showing bared tits. Original bared tit art republication control was protected as a human right first for Jane Hogarth in 1766. A human right protected in a legal case Benjamin Franklin was very aware of. Mistake #1 was a fiat ignoring the human right to control presentation of original art showing bared tits to the public by intentionally spelling the American copy rite as copyright though protecting only a book censorship rite. This was a FIAT despite Sir William Blackstone coining the word copyright in 1766 to include the human right to control public display of bared tits. A right to control bared tit art Benjamin Franklin was very aware of. 

. . . .An I’ll Benjamin Franklin specifically rejected use of the word copyright in the creators clause due to it not being in the dictionaries of the time. A rejection Benjamin Franklin could not repeat due to death when Noah Webster used copyrite spelled copyright to create a dictionary censorship  ritual to monopolize early American school dictionaries and create the American English dialect we still use today.

Mistake #2 1997

Reno v A.C.L.U.

. . . . .in 1996 U.S. Congress passed the Communications Decency Act trying to keep indecent material away from children because by this time unregulated broadcasts of wire communications had begun destroying thousands of years of common human decency development from the time of Eve covering her bare tits with leaves.

 . . . .The Telecommunications Act of 1996 was written to regulate indecent and obscene content on the internet, but was wholly inverted by the VOID FIAT the early free-pornography addict, John Paul Stevens, wrote to destroy human decency developed since Eve first began covering her gorgeous bare tits with leaves.  

. . . . .This black robed free-porn addict  disguised the defined wire medium used by Alexander G. Bell to create a medium of guilt free “indulgences” in free-pornography with a ruling destroying human decency. Children were and still are particularly harmed due to the malfeasant FCC not preserving the innocence of minors.who were then and now are intentionally exposed to free-pornography.  If born in the 20th century in the 50 United States of New Babylon you were harmed by this 2nd FIAT whether you realize this clear fact or not. Yes; Even if you wish to perpetuate free-porn as free soeech and NEVER look at free-porn because being addicted to feeling honorable for resisting the free-porn temptation Is functionally equivalent to being addicted to consuming free-porn every day.

NetChoice v Fitch (25A97) Today &

ZULU BBCPIES

. . .  .   Two arbitrary FIATs were mistakes made to INTENTIONALLY deceive United States citizens and wholly destroy the decency developed by all of humanity. Destroy humans recognizing the indecency of bare hanging tits first covered with leaves by Eve in the garden to keep from being worshipped by Adam due to the new human nature to sin. See this demonstrated on the unregulated 47 USC 153 (59) wire medium at TikTok by going there and searching for Zulu or to any other image search engine on earth and using only six English letters (B B C P I E). This combination of letters is not even an English word.

. . . ., .The Pending NetChoice v Fitch litigation should now be used overturn the VOID 1997 Reno v ACLU FIAT with a countersuit seeking to add the FCC and every porn distributor disguised as a search engine or any other Porn Hub or free distributor of ‘X’ rated videos like Pornhub or.       Xvideos as a class action seeking injunctive relief to establish a free treatment venue.

. . . . An attempt to address and restore the innocence of youth and help the billions of porn addicts created on purpose. Fiscal damages would be too vast to ever be addressed and the damage done by these two FIATS could never meet the breadth of damages caused and continuing because the price of altering human  culture is infinite.

 . . .The damsges done are beyond the value of the entire  GDP of The 50 United States of Babylon though currently called simply the United States.

. . . .Lynn Fitch, I am here because of a clear miracle like Jonah experienced in the belly of a whale. I was told by God many decades ago to alert the Nineveh of America to the sinfulness of their society. I am now telling you of a coming destruction like Gomorrah one faced EXACTLY like Jonah warned Nineveh. Unfortunately; This future won’t be avoided by repenting per the Book. Christians should still repent and change culture so protecting children would now resume being done even though the generation born in 1948 will not pass sway before Christ returns. 

. . . . .We are near the end of all humanity’s time on earth. Considering 1948+120=2,068 and the fact Jesus and I know the year now though Jesus knew down to two decades before Trump was elected. Such is the arbitrary nature of absolutely free free-will.

 

Curtis J. Neeley Jr.

4792634795 t-sms

5014217083 f

NetChoice v Fitch (25A97)

 

DOCKET NO.	ARGUMENT	OPINION	VOTE	AUTHOR	TERM
25A97	TBD	TBD	TBD	TBD	OT 2025

. . . .I would offer my unique perspective and history supporting State Law and offer to train Ms Fitch on how to change the question of law being pursued right now regarding NetChoice v. Fitch, 25A97 to leave ABSOLUTELY no potential to lose whatsoever.

I. . . . sued GOOG, MSFT & FCC and rejected a cash offer of 5,000,000 to settle out of court. My litigation is the only clear reason the “protecting-and-promoting-the-open-internet” order was made on Feb 26, 2015, while I met personally with Antonin Scalia, after being carried by a handful of others up three flights of stairs in a power wheelchair physically in a vintage building.

. . . I met with Honorable Scalia for just under two hours and can’t reveal what was discussed till Feb 14, 2026.

. . . .This does not mean I will violate my honor and reveal what was said educating me and signing a legal reference book . You can read EndingElectiveAbortion.org and see how Roe should have been updated instead of being overturned and remains more honorable today than Mississippi laws regarding abortion as are clearly dishonorable.

. . . .The reason GOOG, MSFT, & U.S. FCC offered me so much is obvious and will become much more obvious after I train Ms Fitch.

. . . . I don’t answer unknown phone numbers but can train Ms Fitch easily by phone or txt message. I have standing in the (25A97) case now and will file an amicus or seek to intervene otherwise. This law technique should be obvious. I will file an amici and bear the death threats use of this obvious fact will cause but I know precisely why Kavanaugh tried to influence this case but is in a very slight minority right now.

. . . . ,I can not believe you have not already sought summary judgement since no question of law or free speech could still be made. I will publish this offer to train Ms Fitch via Tik-Tok and the public already knows much of what apparently still needs to be said.  This will cause death threats and I accept that this will likely result in my assassination. My current existence is obviously a miracle as is most obvious as your staff will see researching me.

Gov/Church rites v human rights

Regarding human rights versus government rites;

 

Yes, very many Europeans regret denial of the rite for allowing the "selected" public to keep and bear firearms.  Ironically, this is NOT any more a fundamental, individual, human right than the government or church rite of marriage. This might shock or offend many alleged conservatives but is an obvious fact.

 

There is no fundamental human right to keep and bear firearms because firearms must first be purchased or be otherwise acquired making this ritual fairly obvious. The plainly obvious reason marriage is not a fundamental human right leaves SCOTUS, 2015 appearing logically senile in addition to being culturally senile. No single individual human on earth can ever be married.  The marriage rite, whether recognized by a church or State, requires two individuals.

 

See this explained as well as read of how Hon Antonin Scalia reacted to an explanation of the error of Citizens United (Yes; Hon. Antonin Scalia regretted this) on Feb. 26, 2015 in about 2,750 words below with linked sources. 

Hon Antonin Scalia was assured privacy till death. Unable to convince another two to protect fetal human dignity by Jan. 11, 2016 there was no longer reasons for Hon Antonin Scalia to persevere and watch over this failed nation.

 

This "Copy[rite] Manifesto" needs the diligent work of a good editor but is very close.  On the three websies below you may see a writing addressing fetal abortion, the copy[rite] heterographic, anonymous  online pornography for children, and gay marage.  This manifesto links all these contentious issues to an intentional early American misspelling by a noted Christian lawyer though apposed by wholly secular Deist and polymath, Benjamin Franklin.

 

http://human-dignity-us.org/ (Includes HTML of Act 301 abortion limit Petition for Certiorari denied Jan. 11, 2016)

http://master-of-photography.us/

http://theendofpornbywire.org/ (Includes HTML of appeal for Eighth Circuit to reconsider America's dishonorable courts)

 

 

--
Sincerely,
Curtis Neeley Jr
14792634795 t-sms

15014217083 f

 

Giving up on "American" courts

I am not a noted lawyer or published privacy authority and will never seek a degree or profess an education because I desire for no school to claim influencing my mind or coloring my principles. I have no desire to be the top 500 or top 5000 of anything or be on any list to compare my mind to another human. I choose to remain an unknown.

After reading one privacy article "online", I deemed the unknown public should use this short lesson. This short lesson on lexicography with supporting etymology clearly explains both the EU/US privacy and copyright/[rite] regime differences and leaves absolutely no room for doubt or further debate. Following the pathway illustrated herein, the public may OWN this discovery. It is not published or talked about because it would embarrass the entire United States.

I am a severely brain injured polymath with no continuous memory pre-2007 and a severely limited ability to remember day-to-day. I use TBI coping techniques to address this and will send this email over and over till a professional replies or asks me to stop. Yes; I realize using polymath is a very arrogant term to use for myself. This is how I would honestly be described already in historical descriptions, if there were ever to be historical descriptions of all I will or have done. I honestly do not understand why or how I know all the "useless trivia" left in my mind from my prior addiction to learning all humanities known scientific facts. I obviously failed to do this but have learned the majority of the basics.

The "small" cultural difference between the EU and the US is founded in the same lexicographical error supported by unconsidered or ignored facts included herein with very exacting etymology.

I touch on this and other advanced science ignored in other ignored legal briefs and an online comment repeated below. This is original research to verify as a comment spawned by an "online" article. Please do not use my name. The public can and will seek to know more about me after Edwards v Beck replaces Roe v Wade for all time in a few weeks to months almost exactly as my amicus curiae and amicus reply encouraged the Eighth Circuit. If this does not happen in less than three months then this will eventually be how abortion stops funding politics and how the abortions called blessed in some future time by Jesus Christ as He approached Calvary becomes an inalienable human right.

----------------comment-------------------------------------------

I did not understand this cartoon but am not the sharpest crayon in the pack. I bet it has something to do with taxes and possibly being late? Editorial or political cartoons have been around since roughly the 1730's and were begun by William Hogarth doing engravings that were then printed. This artists' work or "vision" could be reproduced in early printing presses by a publisher with no artistic skills. This is why, in Hogarth's native England, the human right to control original visual creations was protected with the Engravers Act of 1734. The engraver made a personal statement or personal speech with visual art but this visual art could then be manipulated by another over two centuries before Photoshop. compare Hogarth's political cartoon wth a more vulgar modfication of this engraving like spurred the Engraver's Act of 1734.
http://theendofpornbywire.org/Why-the-1734-engravers-act/

The cartoon could then be used in another political publication and be caused to appear indecent or support a political statement William Hogarth would never support. The Engravers Act of 1734 protected William Hogarth's ability to protect against undesired usage of original cartoon engravings for a renewable period of about 14 years. The right to control against unauthorized usage of these first cartoons was then passed to the surviving spouse for life by the 1766 Hogarth's Act passed two years after the first political cartoonist died.

The following continued spelling error is why the human right to control original speech was never protected in the United States when "America" copied the "1710 Statute of Anne" from England almost verbatim and called this copy of an eighty year old legal rite "America's" Copy[rite] Act of 1790. The Supreme Court called this an artwork monopolization regime unworthy of being called law in Golan v Holder (10-545) in 2012.

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

In an England Noah Webster never lived in, the term colour had frustrated many children along with Noah Webster who felt it should be spelled more like it sounded in common speech. Rather than colour, Mr. Webster felt the word should be spelled color for the  sound or verses the tortured or . Mr Webster asserted there had been an etymological error and revised colour to the Americanization "color" in his first American English Dictionary test-run in 1806. While revising American English in monopolized elementary school textbooks, Noah Webster did not adopt his own new alphabet or the new alphabet of Benjamin Franklin but created many Americanisms by fiat in 1827. Mr. Webster and Mr Franklin agreed on many aspects of America's opportunity to establish a newer and simpler language from the English used in England but did not stop using the letter "K" although both agreed this should be done.

Benjamin Franklin was a noted polymath and published author and scientist who made sure the 1787 Constitution did not use words not included in Samuel Johnston's 1755 "c-Dictionary of the English Language-c" and stated this was because the Constitution was such an impacting document with an international audience of English speakers. Benjamin Franklin required the Constitution include no newly coined terms to avoid potential misinterpretations of the actual meaning intended.

Too ill in 1787 to give his own speech encouraging unanimous adoption of the Constitution, Benjamin Franklin's speech was given by proxy. Mr Franklin had ensured the "progress clause" or Article I, Section 8, Clause 8 of the Constitution described the Congressional authorization needed to protect the fundamental human right to control original inventions, discoveries, or speech. Despite this honorable tenor; The United States' greatest scientist, author, and inventor refused a patent on the "Franklin Stove" invention from 1742 though offered by the governor of Pennsylvania.

Benjamin Franklin stated, "as we enjoy great advantages from the inventions of others, we should be glad of an opportunity to serve others by any invention of ours; and this we should do freely and generously", in his autobiography crediting "God" with any invention gifted to humanity via an inventor like himself.  This is why in America's copy[rite], newly discovered or realized facts, facts like herein are not eligible to be monopolized.

There was one particularly noteworthy new word "coined" by Sir William Blackstone in England in chapter 26, on p406 of Volume II, "Rights of Things" in the "Commentaries on the Laws of England" book series describing exclusive control of original intellectual property or statements perhaps later retracted in 1766. This was one decade and one year after the 1755 "c-Dictionary of the English Language-c". This authoritative series of law books is taught in ALL American laws schools today though this obvious fact has been ignored as could only be intentional.

Clearly Noah Webster and Benjamin Huntington used the early American hunger to secure individual human rights from Kings when the "Bill of Rights" was being considered to monopolize elementary school texts and prohibit reprinting of books imported by wealthy colonists since printing presses were now less expensive. Noah Webster did this to help ensure colour, honour, labour, and such would become color, honor, and labor. Noah Webster copied the "1710 Statute of Anne" rite for authorizing monopolizing book printing almost verbatim ignoring the subsequent "1734 Engraver's Act" and the 1766 "Hogarth's Act". Benjamin Huntington was a career lawyer and conscientious objector to the Revolutionary War. Benjamin Huntington signed the Declaration of Independence but felt armed conflict was initially a dishonorable refusal to settle the dispute legally.

Early in America, the "pistol duels" and "sword duels" used to protect honor in England were considered assault. Fighting to protect honor or reputation was considered absurd or a matter for attorneys to address in court. Benjamin Huntington felt there were adequate legal rituals outside the 1790 Copy[rite] regime to vicariously protect the effect original creations had on honor with the slander, defamation, and liable torts. None of these were included in the copy[rite] regime but NONE of America's attorneys or judges have ever addressed the fundamental human right never protected in America but authorized for protection in the United States like established in 1787.  The United States quickly becan to be overthrown by a wealthy corporate oligarchy that now clearly controls America and is now probably irreversable.

The right to control personal speech online should be protected by 18 U.S.C. 2511 today if applied EXACTLY as written according to Honorable Antonin Scalia. This law was judicially voided by accident because of improper tenor.  This injustice will always be dishonorable for Jimm Larry Hendren, Erin L. Setser, and Timothy L. Brooks. 

This same law could rescue the Garcia v Google from needing to overrule the 1834 Wheaton ruling rejecting the fundamental human right to control speech after fixed (printed or engraved) that had already been protected in England for 100 years when the first SCOTUS consideration was done in America in 1834. This law, 18 U.S.C. 2511, would allow authorization of the YouTube injunction permanently as allowed by section 230 if it had been plead instead of copy[rite] violations only. It is NOT the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals duty to litigate for either party. The only honorable result today for the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals sitting en banc is to rule the common law fundamental human right to control original speech after fixed should always have been protected as the progress clause authorized in 1787 but was never done

I am interested in seeking only amici or co-counsel for my case before SCOTUS. The only path to fixing online might not include United States Courts due to making anonymous access to pornography a new American civil right created in 1997 by Reno v ACLU because of the centuries of impact of an over two hundred year old spelling error leading to re-establishing the indulgences one disputed by Rev Martin Luther on Oct 31, 1517.  The egregious Reno v ACLU  mistake allowed and still allows illegal "obscene, indecent, and profane" communications to be broadcast by radio and by wire begun in 1997 when there were only around 55 million subscribers to wire communications terminated on one end by radio three years before Wi-Fi was trademarked.

You may view this disclosure online HERE. No name is included and no link to ANY particular US v UK privacy regime article is included. It is your decision alone to encourage the continuing of a complete moral failure in America or help educate America's Courts. Do you wish to raise your children with porn by wire still around wherever children carry their phones after digital radio makes everywhere "online"? Logging-in in a authenticated way would keep the porn everywhere but allow parents to supervise their children's communications and prevent consumption of America's free pornography source better known as "online" or "nternet" though starting with a capital "I". I will never bless this undefinable slang term with usage.
You may view this disclosure online HERE http://dianamichellephotos.com/copy%5Brite%5D.html
You may view this disclosure online HERE. http://master-of-photography.us/copy%5Brite%5D.html
You may view this disclosure online HERE. http://theendofpornbywire.org/copy%5Brite%5D.html
You may view this disclosure online HERE. http://groupf16.org/copy%5Brite%5D.htmlYou may view this disclosure online HERE. http://sleepspot.info/copy%5Brite%5D.html