This notice will be electronically
communicated by wires to (25) addresses BCC including:
Ms.
Bettina E. Brownstein Esq, Ms. Susan Talcott Camp Esq, Ms. Courtney
M. Dankworth Esq, Ms. Holly Elizabeth Dickson Esq, Mr. Colin
Jorgensen Esq,Ms. Mary Elizabeth McAlister Esq, Mr. Allan Edward
Parker, Jr. Esq, Ms. Shannon R. Selden Esq,Ms. Anita Staver Esq, Mr.
Claude Gabriel Szyfer Esq, Ms. Stephanie Toti Esq, Time, The New
Republic, Grace Church,
The two primary cultural arguments of ALL time are
the human rituals of reproduction and the human rituals concerning
individual speech.
The earlier human species[1] developed rituals to
counter certain natural human drives and further separated the human
species from "lower" animals. Humans have used rituals
promoted by agreement to rules or laws protecting certain
species-wide desires from natural human drives for pleasure that are
as general as the natural human drives to eat, drink, reproduce,
sleep, or comfortably continue to exist.
Four
examples of “lower” animals having no human ritualized
controls.
1. If one
male desires to mate, this male will attempt to mate regardless of
the wishes of others. {war, rape}
2. If one
animal wants to dispose of another, this animal will dispose of the
other regardless of the wishes of others. {abortion, murder, war}
3. If an
animal wants to speak, this animal will speak regardless of the
wishes of others. {obscenities, treason, propaganda, war}
4. If any
animal obstructs any natural drive of another animal, the obstructed
animal may kill the obstructing animal.{rape, murder, abortion, war}
1. Consuming free-speech (looking) without anyone
knowing or being able to check ages or otherwise "judge"
for the consumption of speech once considered indecent by most
pastors and younger Article III judges is the natural human desire to
exclusively control the self. The human desire for exclusive control
the self is the basis for desiring the ability to make unregulated
speech or desiring the ability to consume unregulated speech
secretly or desiring the ability to cease gestation. This natural
human drive is the same as “lower” animals desiring as
much food as possible when fed abundantly while in a group and hiding
any extra food for speculative later consumption.
2. SCOTUS is most naturally addicted to only their
human free-will regulating their anonymous choices regarding
free-speech or abortion. One SCOTUS clerk advised Curtis J. Neeley
Jr. of an existing plan to protect the anonymous distribution of
speech during a telephone wire communication. This communication was
unpleasant. Five other SCOTUS clerks addressed this human desire as
well. These clerks were not anonymous but Curtis J. Neeley Jr.
remembers only notation of one today due to his or her colloquial job
title and marital status at the time of the call.
3. Curtis J. Neeley Jr. once thought he would never file a brief or
pray for ANY type relief from SCOTUS. This has changed since meeting the wise Honorable Antonin Scalia at age 78. This makes the
SCOTUS gatekeeper clerk's opinions useful and irrelevant at the same
time. Please watch these opinions assisting herein while
concurrently teaching these six SCOTUS clerks and nine SCOTUS
oligarchs to take better control of these types of future
communications.
4. Broadcast is a verb that describes the dispersal
of something without any particular concern about the manner this
something is received. Democrats and Republicans broadcast their
particular political ideals from rooftops, newspapers, mail, and via
unregulated interstate and world-wide wire communications. Farmers
generally broadcast grass, wheat, or other grains with no concern
about how these are received besides perhaps concentration.
18
USC §1462 – 6/25/1948 – 2/8/1996*
Whoever brings into the
United States, or any place subject to the jurisdiction thereof, or
knowingly uses any express company or other common carrier [or
interactive computer service (as defined in section 230(e)(2) of the
Communications Act of 1934)]*, for carriage in interstate or foreign
commerce—
(a) any obscene, lewd,
lascivious, or filthy book, pamphlet, picture, motion-picture film,
paper, letter, writing, print, or other matter of indecent character;
or
(b) any obscene, lewd,
lascivious, or filthy phonograph recording, electrical transcription,
or other article or thing capable of producing sound; or
(c) any drug, medicine,
article, or thing designed, adapted, or intended for producing
abortion, or for any indecent or immoral use; or any written or
printed card, letter, circular, book, pamphlet, advertisement, or
notice of any kind giving information, directly or indirectly, where,
how, or of whom, or by what means any of such mentioned articles,
matters, or things may be obtained or made; or
Whoever knowingly takes
or receives, from such express company or other common carrier [or
interactive computer service (as defined in section 230(e)(2) of the
Communications Act of 1934)]* any matter or thing the carriage or
importation of which is herein made unlawful—
Shall be fined under
this title or imprisoned not more than five years, or both, for the
first such offense and shall be fined under this title or imprisoned
not more than ten years, or both, for each such offense thereafter.
18
USC §1464 – 6/25/1948 – 9/13/1994*
Whoever utters any
obscene, indecent, or profane language by means of radio
communication shall be fined [under this title]* or imprisoned not
more than two years, or both.
5. On 9/15/1999, long
after the
6/26/1997
failure of SCOTUS to recognize the more than 33.8 million commercial
users of seamless integration of wire and radio communications in
1995, Wi-Fi was trademarked by the Wi-Fi Alliance. This was more
than ten years before the 77 year-old SCOTUS author of the obvious
factual error alleging some imaginary, “[holy] new medium for
human communications” retired. Honorable John Paul Stevens
alleged to discover a “[holy]new medium” that did not
exist when this judge was sixteen and the FCC was created to regulate
wire and radio broadcasting and was therefore exempt from archaic FCC
moral regulations protecting children who would eventually be
entitled to absolute free speech. The disproportional impact of
childhood teachings is usually forgotten by the elderly and
apparently Honorable John Paul Stevens was not exempt.
https://supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/521/844/
6.
This oligarch ruled till 6/29/2010 despite the immoral
reintroduction of unregulated communications in 1997 or the immoral
reintroduction of indulging in guilt-free speech. This clear
immorality was first recognized and protested by Rev Martin Luther on
8/31/1517 with 95 Thesis in about 1800 Latin words that translate
into roughly 2,741 of Americanized English or roughly as many more
words in Americanized English than this “disputation”
has to this point.
7. Anything uttered today “online” is
concurrently uttered by radio communications. This clear fact was
true for more than 33,800,000 commercial subscribers when Honorable
John Paul Stevens alleged to find a “[holy] new medium”
entitled to guilt-free free-speech.
8. This ruling was
VOID on 6/26/1997 and has become more VOID
every year since for the last eighteen years or long enough to
jump-start the type living predicted in one ancient book,[2] as will
follow. The new cultural immorality of today may now be irreversible
but the ability to assert legal age and being granted permission to
make or consume indecent speech has existed since before “online”
was discovered in 1997. Asserting legal age and permission to access
otherwise forbidden legal speech will not reduce the availability-of
or access-to otherwise legal forbidden speech. Adults and judges
would then be responsible for their own minor's speech or their own
clerks' speech, like alleged already today, -by mistake. The
profitability of otherwise forbidden legal speech will quickly
return. Sure; Legal pornography will mostly still control the
profitability of integrated wire and radio communications disguised
as another imaginary medium since 1997.
9. Free pornography and profitable illegal
pornography escaping prosecution will cease almost immediately when
falsification of IP address becomes a crime the FCC pursues to
promote safety like created to do when: 1) Honorable John Paul
Stevens was a sixteen year old teenager; and 2)World War II had not
yet begun; and 3) nuclear weapons did not yet exist; and 4) Israel
was not yet a nation; and 5) humans had not yet visited space, much
less the moon.
2 Timothy 3:1-5
“This know also,
that in the last days perilous times shall come. For men shall be
lovers of their own selves, covetous, boasters, proud, blasphemers,
disobedient to parents, unthankful, unholy, without natural
affection, trucebreakers, false accusers, incontinent, fierce,
despisers of those that are good, traitors, heady, highminded, lovers
of pleasures more than lovers of God; Having a form of godliness, but
denying the power thereof: from such turn away.”
Matthew 24:37-39
“But as the days
of Noah were, so shall also the coming of the Son of man be. For as
in the days that were before the flood they were eating and drinking,
marrying and giving in marriage, until the day that Noe entered into
the ark, and knew not until the flood came, and took them all away;
so shall also the coming of the Son of man be.”
10. No natural right to cease gestation without
risk of physical consequences has ever existed and will never exist
for “lower” animals. The natural right to kill undesired
or inconvenient offspring after birth existed exclusively for “lower”
animals since human rules, rites, or laws forbid this natural right
for the human species and at the same time forbid the existing
natural right to artificially cause gestation to cease by accepting
the risks involved.
11. In 1973 the SCOTUS oligarchy honorably ruled
that the natural right to protect and control the self outweighed the
prospective natural right to exist when ONLY these two competing
rights were addressed. This allowed female human the ability to
cease gestation after this process began without facing the choice of
starvation, coat-hanger mutilation, or other gestation cessation
inducing risks. The human species had finally progressed in
establishing honorable rules like were implied to one day become a
human moral choice by the main character in one popular ancient book
as this character considered eminent death while recalling prior
choices to eliminate inhabitants of two cities and the elimination of
all life in one region of the earth except for fish and one boatload
of animals. The ability of human females to consciously elect to not
become parents by moral choice and not face introduction of another
life destined to end unfavorably was clearly implied by this
distressed main character as follows from this famous book cited
again as noted in end note [2].
Luke
23:27-31 – (NASB)
27 And following Him was
a large crowd of the people, and of women who were mourning and
lamenting Him. 28 But Jesus turning to them said, “Daughters of
Jerusalem, stop weeping for Me, but weep for yourselves and for your
children. 29 For behold, the days are coming when they will say,
‘Blessed are the barren, and the wombs that never bore, and the
breasts that never nursed.’ 30 Then they will begin to say to
the mountains, ‘Fall on us,’ and to the hills, ‘Cover
us.’ 31 For if they do these things when the tree is green,
what will happen when it is dry?”
Exodus
20:13 – (KJV)
13 Thou shalt not kill.
12. Roe
v Wade is treated by many as allowing violation of this book's
command from earlier forbidding killing. This rule, rite, ritual, or
law is also translated as, “you shall not murder” (ESV).
This implication requires common sense and the associated moral human
choices. Using the literal translation from 1605, -done about
eighty-eight years after Rev. Martin Luther's 95 Thesis which lead to
King Henry VIII commissioning a translation in 1535, requires only
common sense for use. Most interpretations of this very exacting rule
do not forbid consumption of meat. One interpretation of this very
exacting rule does prohibit consumption of meat, capital punishment,
abortion, or any human killing of any animal life. This could be
treated as a more honorable or just interpretation until considering
the consumption of even flour or corn requires killing the potential
for new plant life in every grain of wheat or kernel of corn. Meat
eaters encourage plant consumption(killing) by plant eaters so humans
can then consume these plant eaters. The Latin translation of Exodus
20:13 is “non occides”. This language leaves a
great deal implied and must be why Latin is the language of law.
13. Roe
v Wade was honorable and addressed other important reasons for
FUTURE modification of the regulation of gestation after science made
continuation of gestation more hazardous to the self than cessation
of gestation. AR Act 301 will be ruled a permissible modification of
human laws addressing the desires of other impacted parties before
the Eighth Circuit Court of Appeals today better than was considered
in Roe. This ruling will be more honorable than addressing
speculative claims for preservation of potential human life requiring
the morally impossible determination of when humanity begins, as will
never be addressed. Every Arkansas voter is now before the Eighth
Circuit Court of Appeals including every person in Arkansas whether
these people actually voted or could not yet vote due to being in the
third day of gestation or only in an ovary or testicle. There are
millions of live sperm cells swimming in a uterus before this court
today though none of these live cells may continue growing long
enough to be recognized as lives.
14. 5017937849CJNJr1986 This communication should
impact the future of humanity and is sent by impermissibly
unregulated wire to those listed above by name but will be broadcast
by wire and be read or ignored by ANYONE on earth just as the Eighth
Circuit Court of Appeals may do with the following broadcasting of
facts. Both the “Pro-Life” and “Pro-Death”
interests should be able to clearly see the need for FCC regulation
of wire broadcasts to protect the public and should recognize the
exclusive fundamental human right to control the body honorably
requires allowing painless voluntary cessation of gestation until
this gestation might impact the exclusive rights of others including
the child resting an ear on a uterus and hearing a heartbeat. The
potential life, individual, baby, fetus, embryo, or cell group is
wholly irrelevant and superseded by the rights of the father and
the public teaching children to treat sex as a decision that includes
addressing the potential for new life.
15. 5017937849CJNJr1986 Curtis J. Neeley Jr. once had absolutely no respect for oligarchs who remain active during bad
behavior or after age sixty-eight due to witnessing cultural senility, if not pure senility, of Lord Most Honorable Jimm Larry Hendren. Teenagers are subject to the draft
but can't purchase alcohol until the age of twenty-one. A young
eighteen year old female may “honorably” and legally star
in the most outrageous of legal “online” pornography for
three years as a married mother and still be unable to purchase
alcohol. (Many already do.) Honor would remain intact and she
would never be recognized by anyone without an authenticated claim to
wish to see this type behavior in a way that could be checked when
the FCC begins enforcing the Communications Act as written in 1934.
This will make this type female decision once again profitable and
restore Playboy print magazine to profitability. Yes; SCOTUS, -age is
just a number as are (3, 3.1415926535898, 18, 21, 68, 70). None of
these numbers ever exactly describe a person with any detail though
the first three numbers could not purchase alcohol. (68) could still
be an honorable judge in many nations. The last number could not
still be a judge in ANY honorable court worldwide except for the U.S. where a test must be developed to ensure good behavior on a per case basis.
16. 5017937849CJNJr1986 There are females who enjoy
treatment by a subset of the general public in ways that appear
exploitative. There are also females who would prefer suicide to
motherhood. Thirteen weeks is enough time today, after Act 301 is
affirmed as legal, for these females to painlessly cease gestation.
There are millions of people with very firm beliefs “souls”
are created by humans via intercourse. Curtis J. Neeley Jr. has a
firm belief in God and Jesus Christ and the sacrificial death by
Christ followed by resurrection. Repentance for evils done and
accepting the gift of Jesus Christ is all that is required for
existing forever in God's presence. This belief is speculative and
irrelevant to both issues addressed herein.
17. 5017937849CJNJr1986 “Prayers” are
the ONLY interstate or world-wide broadcast communications that
should be exempt from regulation by the FCC according to current law.
“Online” unregulated indecency like is occurs today has
already destroyed the sexual morality of two generations. Abortions
prior to 13-weeks of gestation is the future Christ encouraged for
the masses He knew would reject His sacrificial gift on Calvary.
Curtis J. Neeley Jr. has a firm belief the free-will God allowed Adam
and Eve to retain includes permission to perform-in and enjoy
performing-in or consuming even obscene pornography communicated by
wire to individuals or groups but not for illegal broadcast to the
anonymous public by GOOG after intercepting good Samaritan's
authentication filtration. This is as clearly illegal as murder for
anyone else apparently except GOOG.
18. This fundamental human right to produce (speak)
or consume (hear or view) pornography includes a concurrent duty to
jealously forbid performance-by and consumption-of pornographic
depictions by children regardless of how artistic the nakedness might
be. Curtis J. Neeley Jr. admits belief in God and Christ is logical
only for the most intelligent of the human species by offsetting
evidence of irrelevant history described precisely but summarily in
Genesis alleging creation took only six days.
19. Curtis J. Neeley Jr. experienced things and has
advanced knowledge of these no human besides Lazarus could ever have.
One example includes technical details of how commercial FM radio
stations can beginning offering Wi-Fi, country, or rock music TODAY
on one data stream. This advanced knowledge shares too many details
with Top-Secret multichannel microwave tropo-scatter military
telecommunications technology (USMC 2831) to be described without a
waiver by the U.S. Attorney General or release by the USMC
Commandant. Few humans today could hope to understand this technology
but thousands on earth will or already do in China. Curtis J. Neeley
Jr. apologizes to the humans who were negatively impacted by
dishonorable parts of his past that are not remembered fully. The
severe TBI and severe physical disabilities are perhaps punishment
enough.
"online”
FREE SPEECH
“Regulations
re: Gestation -ABORTION-
1. This
extremely profitable argument will soon end and neither side will
like or protest Act 301's affirmation as the gestation law for the
whole earth it will soon become. This is abundantly clear whether
fathers or parents are mentioned in the 15 minutes of oral arguments
on 1/13/2015 or are not. Allowing Act 301 to be enforced and then
fine tuned as suggest to address speculative claims is obvious to any
ninth grade student in the United States after reading the briefs or
just the amicus reply now before the Eighth Circuit Court of Appeals.
Curtis J Neeley Jr most sincerely apologizes for mistakenly stating
Mike Huckabee vetoed Act 301. Realizing the AR governor vetoed Act
301, this severely brain injured but extremely interested party used
Mr Mike Huckabee's name by mistake. This apology is included in the
reply brief supporting the Eighth Circuit Court.
05/16/2014
amicus curiae in Support of Appellant
05/27/2014
Appellant's Brief
06/03/2014
amicus curiae in Support of Appellant
06/18/2014
amicus curiae in Support of Appellant
07/10/2014
Apellee's Brief
07/18/2014
amicus curiae in Support of Appellee
07/18/2014
amicus curiae in Support of Appellee
07/18/2014
amicus curiae in Support of Appellee
07/22/2014
Reply Brief in Support of Eighth Circuit Court
07/23/2014
Appellant's Reply Brief
FREE
DOCKET MIRROR OF EVERY FILING ONLINE
20. Refusal to stop the free-online-speech
litigation completely for five-million dollars offered casually by
GOOG would be a dishonorable alternative to seeing the “abortion”
and “free-speech” issues resolve amicably for humanity.
Curtis will not further elaborate about the six-plus weeks on a
respirator and unresponsive in a coma for the same reason Lazarus
does not describe the four days he was dead in the book. Who knows;
Perhaps this is all the result of coping with a TBI and a persistent
delusion?
21. Both of these issues will resolve as suggested
here but perhaps not at this time. Individual pornographic
free-speech will be consumed by most while minor children will still
have the innocence of youth protected from the new “free”
drug of pornography. Sexual intercourse will become wholly a
pleasurable recreational act that includes no real risks for
procreation unless chosen. The “Pro-Life” interests may
keep spending money trying to ban abortion otherwise but will quickly
learn this is futile and costly
22. The coming affirmation of legality of Act 301
is the way laws remain and coming FCC regulation of ALL wire
communication broadcasting to the anonymous will end the need for
protection against indecent broadcasts. China and Iran will soon
throw open their porn protections allowing all of humanity to finally
share knowledge and collaborate instantly like was once the professed
goal of wholly evil Defendant organized criminal enterprise Google
Inc. Voting by authenticated wire communications will then be
possible
--
Sincerely,
Curtis Neeley
Jr
14792634795 t-sms
15014217083 f
http://theendofpornbywire.org/12-26-2014_notice.html
http://search.incredibar.com/search.php?q=5017937849CJNJr1986
[2]Let every reader engage
this notice with absolutely no presumptions or speculative
assertions
from these ancient texts and address this notice as
regarding only clear fact.