Reply to professor's profession of confusion

ALL American lawyers were wholly confused by a simple, intentionally, disparaging spelling error in 1790. This American mistake at law is too obvious to ignore here after the law professor's BLOG post I read regarding technology and marketing law.
Q4 2014 & Q1 2015 Quick Links Part 7
(Consumer Reviews, RTBF, Defamation, Censorship, Sec. 230)
This posted there as a comment. (slow-link)

International Censorship

.... has always existed because America created an imaginary new medium in 1997 and told the federal agency responsible for American censorship of joint radio and wire medium broadcasting(s) (disguised as an imaginary new medium) a mysterious new medium was discovered and entitled to absolute unqualified free speech. The Reno v ACLU ruling was moronic and void on June 26, 1997. This void and ignorant ruling still keeps pornography flowing freely in America. This is why China built the Great Firewall and is why ALL American search engines respond differently based on IP geolocations of requests for queries like mentioned as geoblocking in a previous guest-post at the Professor's BLOG. This comment will return to this law mistake later.

Right to Be Forgotten

The absolute, natural, human right to control repetition of personal information was protected in England first in 1734 and was first called copyright in 1766 by Sir William Blackstone in Volume II "Rights of Things" on page 406 with footnotes L and M referring to usage of "copy-right" in prior English rulings. This twenty-sixth chapter first usage of copyright for exclusive control of original communications was in the "Commentaries on the Laws of England law book series still taught in ALL American law schools today! Though used by an English "Kings Counsel and Sergeant of Law" in an authoritative legal text; the coining of the term "copyright" occurred in 1766 and could not be placed in Johnston's 1755 dictionary used in 1787 for composition of the United States Constitution.

The SPLIT!

This was where American and European protection for human rights and free speech parted ways forever! This is why Garcia v Google confused American lawyers so badly including the noted law "professor" running one BLOG. See his confusion demonstrated in an amicus filed therein.

Section 230 MISTAKE at LAW

America's Supreme Court wholly misinterpreted the CDA on June 26, 1997 and turned the law Congress wrote to protect the decency of communications and protect ISPs from liability for communications they delivered but did not make. American laws protected telephone companies from acquiring liability for the content of communications they delivered with rare exceptions like ignoring the do not call list.

EXCLUSIVE ISP LAW before rewritten by U.S. Courts

ISPs had no reason to inspect the communications they delivered as a result of Section 230 exemption from liability. The Supreme Court wholly misinterpreted the CDA on June 26, 1997 and created the legal foundations for wholly unregulated free speech by twisting the protections for "good Samaritans" who labeled or blocked indecent content into the Section 230 MISTAKE at LAW excusing search engines for broadcasting obscene, indecent or profane communications the "good Samaritan" authors or publishers attempted to prevent from illegally and dishonorably broadcasting to the unauthenticated public. Searching for labia at photo.net or at deviantart.com or at GOOG, or MSFT shouuld require authentication like at FB to protect children and horny judges.
Should a common carrier be this unsafe and this ILLEGAL?

America's defamation, slander copy[rite] BAND-AIDs

The ability to limit electronic communications access was protected by U.S. law clearly till this commentator personally offended the current ruling judicial oligarchy. America's defamation, slander and copy[rite] BAND-AIDs are not able to protect the honor of this nation's judicial branch today from bleeding-out after the Garcia v Google and Neeley v 5 Federal Communications Commissioners, et al became amputations of justice made or encouraged for the Eighth and Ninth Circuits today. These will each be presented to the Supreme Court within 90 days but BAND-AIDs will not be adequate for the Reno v ACLU evisceration of U.S. law and the amputated human right to control reproduction of original creations ignored due to intentional misspelling in the U.S. since the May 31, 1790 but protected in England since 1734.

WAKE UP AMERICA

ALL Title II usage of "nternet" communications is NOTHING besides wire communications defined in 1934 whether delivered by Wi-Fi or mobile phone apparatus for the last few miles back to the wires that allow terrestrial communications to travel beyond line of site by radio. EVERY "obscene, indecent, or profane" communication accessible by "nternet" is illegally broadcast to the unsuspecting unauthenticated public by radio in violation of U.S. law.

WAKE UP AMERICA
Please; WAKE UP!!!

AMERICA overthrew the UNITED STATES from
May 31, 1790 to Citizens United on January 20, 2010.
This was a decent 219-year 8-month self rule experiment and I hope this failure is not irreversible but it looks irreversible already.